Linux-Advocacy Digest #738, Volume #34 Wed, 23 May 01 19:13:03 EDT
Contents:
Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft! (Rick)
Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft! ("Quantum Leaper")
Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft! (Rick)
Re: Linux beats Win2K (again) (Chronos Tachyon)
Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft! (Rick)
Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft! ("Ayende Rahien")
Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft! ("Quantum Leaper")
Re: Richard Stallman what a tosser, and lies about free software (Jan D.)
Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft! (Dave Martel)
Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop ("David L. Moffitt")
Re: Dell Meets Estimates ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Just when Linux starts getting good, Microsoft buries it in the ("Aaron R.
Kulkis")
Re: Just when Linux starts getting good, Microsoft buries it in the ("Aaron R.
Kulkis")
Re: IBM to let Linux fans use mainframe--for free ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft!
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 17:52:29 -0400
Daniel Johnson wrote:
>
> "Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Daniel Johnson wrote:
> > >
> > > "Quantum Leaper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:zrzO6.22194$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
> > > > Atari, Color Computer and C64 were all cheaper than the Apple II.
> > >
> > > So were quite a few others, actually. There
> > > were a *lot* of different PCs available then.
> >
> > No. There NO other PC's then. There wasnt until teh IBM PC. The others
> > were personal computers.
>
> Errrr... you are aware of what the acronym
> "PC" stands for, right?
>
> Back then it was hardly the exclusive
> province of IBM's machines. THat had
> to wait until more software was
> available, and the IBM PC's graphics
> capabilities got better.
>
> > <snip>
> >
> > > > The GS came out in what 1984 or 85, it was after the C64, I do
> remember
> > > > that, since the C64 had the best sound until the GS.
> >
> > The IIgs came out in Fall of 1986
>
> Pretty late. Much *too* late; it was up
> against 80286s by then, and the 386 was not
> far off.
>
The only reason the GS was "too" late was Apple. Western digital could
have kept up refining the 65xxx family, but a a color computer that was
less expensive than the MAc would have cut into Mac sales.
> [snip]
> > The IIgs GUI conformed to the Apple Human Interface Guidelines. You
> > could run the original deskop on a IIe. Now... do you know how it
> > worked?
>
> Yes, I even programmed it once. It worked darned
> near exactly like the UI of a Macintosh, but in
> color.
>
> You could not ever use it on a //e however. There
> was a horrible bastardized thing involving a special
> font on the later Apple IIs, but it was not the
> same at all.
WHen the Apple IIgs came out, you could use the desktop on a IIe. You
say you'ver "programmed" the GS, yet you dont know about this. You have
0 Apple II credibility.
--
Rick
------------------------------
From: "Quantum Leaper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft!
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 21:51:05 GMT
"Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Daniel Johnson wrote:
> >
> > "Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Daniel Johnson wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > > > > Other software *did* exist. IBM would sell
> > > > > > you genuine DOS, not to mention DR-DOS.
> > > > >
> > > > > Pricing. The CP/M offered by IBM has hugely overpriced, as you
have
> > been
> > > > > told.
> > > >
> > > > CP/M was a Digital Research project.
> > >
> > > Duh.
> > > I repeat:
> > > Pricing. The CP/M offered by IBM has hugely overpriced, as you have
been
> > > told.
> >
> > A pretty silly thing for Digitial Research
> > to do, I'm sure you'll agree.
> >
>
> DR didnt do it, dolt, IBM did.
>
What was the price IBM price of CP/M compared to the price IBM charged it
customers?
------------------------------
From: Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft!
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 17:54:49 -0400
Daniel Johnson wrote:
>
> "T. Max Devlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Said Daniel Johnson in comp.os.linux.advocacy on Mon, 21 May 2001
> > [...]
> > >That is also a consideration, but I don't see that Windows
> > >had a very large cost advantage then.
> >
> > I don't see why it should need to be very large at all. The trick is
> > simply that it is maintained long enough to ensure that all competitors
> > have been taken out with other anti-competitive attacks.
>
> ... or competitive ones, for that matter. Yes?
>
> > After that, of
> > course, you can maintain monopoly prices, and steadily ensure that
> > consumers pay more and more and more for the product over time, as MS
> > has done for the past twenty years or so.
>
> No, not really. Windows typically costs around $10-$20
> per computer, and it hasn't changed much since it took
> off.
>
> There's a reason for this; Microsoft knows that if they
> jack up prices enough, they will create an opportunity
> for a competitor to supplant them, even if that
> competing product is not as good.
>
Digital tried that. They died. Go died. Netscape died.
> If Windows becomes expensive enough, Linux on
> the desktop could actually succeed! Think of that,
> and tremble.
>
Microsoft is already expensive enough. Linux can be had for media costs.
No licensing fees. How much cheaper does it have to get?
> However, MS is not dumb enough to let this
> happen to them just because of some silly
> anti-trust theory.
This shows how ignorant and arrogant you really are.
--
Rick
------------------------------
From: Chronos Tachyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux beats Win2K (again)
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 21:56:33 GMT
On Wed 23 May 2001 01:28, Donn Miller wrote:
> Edward Rosten wrote:
>
>> They absorb enything that hist them, however, they do radiate as well.
>>
>> Black holes have to radiate to obey the 2nd law of thermodynamics. It's
>> calles Hawking radiation.
>
> It's something about matter becoming extremely superheated as it
> accelerates towards the singularity, which causes X-rays to radiate from
> the black hole. (Let me guess - now someone will be saying X-rays are
> faster than light, right? 8-)
>
>
Hawking radiation has absolutely nothing to do with the X-rays produced by
infalling matter. Because of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, the more
precisely the location of a particle is known (the singularity of the black
hole) the less precisely the velocity is known. This uncertainty in
velocity increases as the size of the black hole shrinks and the location
of the singularity is known more exactly, to the point that any black hole
without a steady diet of new matter will eventually evaporate and explode
in a burst of gamma rays.
--
Chronos Tachyon
Guardian of Eristic Paraphernalia
Gatekeeper of the Region of Thud
[Reply instructions: My real domain is "echo <address> | cut -d. -f6,7"]
------------------------------
From: Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft!
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 18:05:54 -0400
Quantum Leaper wrote:
>
> "Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Daniel Johnson wrote:
> > >
> > > "Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > Daniel Johnson wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > > > > > > Other software *did* exist. IBM would sell
> > > > > > > you genuine DOS, not to mention DR-DOS.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Pricing. The CP/M offered by IBM has hugely overpriced, as you
> have
> > > been
> > > > > > told.
> > > > >
> > > > > CP/M was a Digital Research project.
> > > >
> > > > Duh.
> > > > I repeat:
> > > > Pricing. The CP/M offered by IBM has hugely overpriced, as you have
> been
> > > > told.
> > >
> > > A pretty silly thing for Digitial Research
> > > to do, I'm sure you'll agree.
> > >
> >
> > DR didnt do it, dolt, IBM did.
> >
> What was the price IBM price of CP/M compared to the price IBM charged it
> customers?
What?
--
Rick
------------------------------
From: "Ayende Rahien" <don'[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft!
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 01:05:06 +0200
"Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Quantum Leaper wrote:
> > > DR didnt do it, dolt, IBM did.
> > >
> > What was the price IBM price of CP/M compared to the price IBM charged
it
> > customers?
>
> What?
How much money did IBM had to pay for DR per each copy of CP/M that they
sold?
How much money did IBM charged from the customer per each copy of CP/M that
the customer bought?
What is the price difference?
------------------------------
From: "Quantum Leaper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft!
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 22:15:42 GMT
"Edward Rosten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:9eeh4u$98g$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> > If your assertion is correct, then the majority of 6502 instructions
> >> > would take 3 cycles: fetch instruction, fetch data, execute. This
> >> > sounds corect to me and of course would demolish Erik's point even
> >> > more.
> >>
> >> Indeed. The implied addressing ones take two cycles. These include
> >>
> >> TAX, TXA, T??..., NOP, INX, INY, etc
> >>
> >> Others take more, for instance
> >>
> >> LDA #XX
> >>
> >> Takes 3 since it has 2 memory fetches (I'm pretty sure it takes 3) Zero
> >> page ones take more and general memory address ones take more still.
> >>
>
> > Zero page and Immediate both took 2 cycles and Absolute took 3 cycles,
> > p416 C= programmer ref guide. Zero page was always fast than Absolute
> > addressing. The only reason I knew were the guide was, I just got
> > done cleaning up all the old Commodore equipment, I have to sort the
> > stuff.
>
> I can't remember the name, but LDA #xx (load accumulator with the literal
> xx) should be faster than LDA xx (where xx is a location in zero page)
> since the first has to fetch the instruction and the literal. The next
> must fetch the instruction, the literal address and the contents of the
> address.
>
I guess Commodore Programmers Refencence Guide is Wrong and your right?
LDA #xx - Immediate and took 2 cycles
LDA $xx - Zero Page and took 2 cycles
LDA $xxxx - Absolute and took 3 cycles
> The slowest one like this is LDA xxxx because it has to fetch 2 literal
> address bytes.
>
True, it took 3 cycles, compare 2 for the others.
------------------------------
From: Jan D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Richard Stallman what a tosser, and lies about free software
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 22:35:35 GMT
In article <Rs3M6.18991$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Perl is often counted as GPL'd, yet the GPL was probably applied as an
> alternate license specifically to avoid the exclusion problem.
Well, considering that early perl (2 and 3) was GPL only, this is
not true. The Artistic License wasn't invented back then. The
Artistic License is the alternate license.
Jan D.
------------------------------
From: Dave Martel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft!
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 16:28:14 -0600
On Wed, 23 May 2001 21:51:05 GMT, "Quantum Leaper"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>"Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> Daniel Johnson wrote:
>> >
>> > "Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> > > Daniel Johnson wrote:
>> > [snip]
>> > > > > > Other software *did* exist. IBM would sell
>> > > > > > you genuine DOS, not to mention DR-DOS.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Pricing. The CP/M offered by IBM has hugely overpriced, as you
>have
>> > been
>> > > > > told.
>> > > >
>> > > > CP/M was a Digital Research project.
>> > >
>> > > Duh.
>> > > I repeat:
>> > > Pricing. The CP/M offered by IBM has hugely overpriced, as you have
>been
>> > > told.
>> >
>> > A pretty silly thing for Digitial Research
>> > to do, I'm sure you'll agree.
>> >
>>
>> DR didnt do it, dolt, IBM did.
>>
>What was the price IBM price of CP/M compared to the price IBM charged it
>customers?
Don't know about IBM, but I bought my copy from Digital Research for
$250. IIRC, they had two prices, $250 for hobbyists and $600 for
businesses. About a year after buying my copy I think the hobbyist
price dropped to around $120.
------------------------------
From: "David L. Moffitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 17:39:16 -0500
"Roberto Alsina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> David L. Moffitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >"Roberto Alsina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> On Tue, 22 May 2001 15:34:49 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, 22 May 2001 15:15:03 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >"You've got MALE.. sex organs!" wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Aw, suck my dick, you little right wing turd. I'll insult little
> >> >> >> phoney fuckheads like you all I want. I've earned my rights to
> >> >> >> criticize little bastards like you.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I hope you get your wish for nationwide gun ban. Then me and all my
> >> >> >rightwing gunnut friends can legally invade your home and totally
> >> >> >trash it out looking for yours.
> >> >>
> >> >> Apparently you are unaware that doing such a thing is illegal,
> >> >> and a ban on guns would not change that situation. In fact, even without
> >> >> a gun, according to what I have read lately, he would be legally
> >> >> entitled to anally electrocute you.
> >> >
> >> >Evidently, you haven't noticed that the POLICE and the (all volounteer) ARMY
> >> >and MARINES are all, according to the anti-gun people, "right wing gun nuts"
> >>
> >> You are not a policeman, and you are not a soldier. You are a reservist.
> >> You are, though, a right wing nut, and if you did the above, it would be
> >> illegal.
> >>
> >> >Who the fuck is going to enforce this gun ban, other than the POLICE,
> >> >the ARMY and the MARINES?
> >>
> >> The police, yes. The army and the marines, no, because they are not
> >> law enforcement agencies. It is illegal for a soldier to enter
> >> your house without permission, is it not?
> >
> >%%%% They did at Waco.
>
> Those were not soldiers, they were federal law enforcement agencies.
> And they did have permission, in the form of a search warrant.
%%%% Military personnel were in the tanks, as advisors and flying the helicopters.
> >> And even a policeman will need a search warrant.
> >
> >%%%% They didn't at Waco.
> >
>
> And having guns did them a whole lot of good, to those Davidians,
> didn't it?
%%%% Not against flammable tear gas banned by the military it didn't. (resent release
of hidden information)
> --
> Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,misc.invest.stocks
Subject: Re: Dell Meets Estimates
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 18:42:11 -0400
cjt & trefoil wrote:
>
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
> >
> > Mike wrote:
> > >
> <snip>
> > > Sun isn't very competitive in the low end server market, and their volumes
> >
> > define "low end server" in a way that does NOT mean "providing a service
> > (such as printing)" which can't be handled on THE SAME MACHINE which is
> > providing high-end services?
> >
> ><snip>
>
> The print servers I encounter these days are usually just a card in the back
> of the printer, anyway. Look how well HP is doing and decide whether you
> even want to play in that market.
good point. But Mafia$oft needs a whole NT monster to handle this simple task.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Just when Linux starts getting good, Microsoft buries it in the
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 18:44:52 -0400
Chad Myers wrote:
>
> "Donn Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > JS \\ PL wrote:
> >
> > > Well after half a day checking out the new XP OS, I have to say IT KICKS
> > > MANDRAKE ASS!!
> > > Internet connection stays when switching users!
> >
> > You mean you lose your internet connection whenever you log out? It's
> > the way you have KDE set up that is at fault, because kppp is exiting
> > when you logout. But you should be able to login to your provider with
> > a command-line equivalent of ppp, so that your internet connection will
> > stay up once you start it, no matter who logs in or out.
>
> No, above he said that Mandrake DID keep the connection OPEN, and
> existing Windows did not.
>
> Windows XP DOES keep it open now as well.
As usual, Mafia$oft 25 years BEHIND the rest of the industry.
>
> -c
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Just when Linux starts getting good, Microsoft buries it in the
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 18:45:45 -0400
JS \\ PL wrote:
>
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > JS \\ PL wrote:
> > >
> > > I have to say, Linux Mandrake 8 was looking real damn good. Support for
> all
> > > my hardware (for once) easy set-up, even seting up networking and
> connection
> > > sharing was painless. Good newsreader - Knode, pretty stable OS. I even
> > > liked the fact that it stayed connected to the Internet when switching
> users
> >
> > this has been a fact of Unix family operating systems since they were
> > first networked (i.e. 1970's)
> >
> >
> > > (unlike Win2K)
> >
> > Another admission that Mafia$oft is over 30 years behind in basic
> technology.
>
> I was wrong. It's a post install regedit in WINNT that I didn't know about.
And using regedit is all intuitive and newbie-friendly how, exactly?
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: IBM to let Linux fans use mainframe--for free
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 18:48:23 -0400
fmc wrote:
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I found this info at:
> >
> http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/zd/20010522/tc/ibm_to_let_linux_fans_use_mainfr
> ame--for_free_1.html
> >
> > Anyone knows how to get this access?
>
> Yes, read this:
>
> http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/zd/20010522/tc/ibm_to_let_linux_fans_use_mainfr
> ame--for_free_1.html
When posting long URL's please adjust your line length so that they don't
get fucked up
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/zd/20010522/tc/ibm_to_let_linux_fans_use_mainframe--for_free_1.html
> fm
>
> >
> > Zalek
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
