torbenh wrote: >> Also note that there's no (easy) way back, we're entirely switching to >> jackd2, that is, the user won't have the possibility to select jackd1 >> instead. >> > > great... many thanks. :((((((( >
For me this will be an advantage, because now I need to build several dummy packages (or any other dirty solution) for jack, libjack, development to avoid inconsistencies when I'm using JACK2 and by the way, even if I would use JACK1, but instead of the distro's version the current self compiled version, I need to do that, because auto-generated by checkinstall there will be one package for jack, libjack and development ;). IMO the user should have the choice between JACK1 and JACK2 and this separated packages should become one package. JACK isn't an application that's needed by the averaged Linux user, so it shouldn't be to much work to keep a distro stable for both versions of JACK and in addition there's no need to take care about rules that don't allow to have jack and libjack in one package. 2 cents, Ralf _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev