Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Arnold Krille wrote: >> On Friday 16 April 2010 19:23:33 Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> >>> hermann wrote: >>> >>>> I hope, when debian switch to jack2, they will make it in one packet >>>> (maximal a second for the dev files), that's what could make it >>>> easer to >>>> switch the version for people how like to switch. >>>> >>> Full ACK, OTOH let's put our hands on our hearts ... Who is using Linux >>> audio and doesn't compile one or two things depending to JACK ;)? I >>> vote >>> for one package for all! >>> >> >> Hopefully they will think again before following this. >> >> Why should all users get the files on their disks that are needed >> only for debugging and developing? >> Disk-space might not be an issue with your >> state-of-the-art-all-inclusive machine, but not everyone has such a >> thing. Some have older machines still running with <20GB disk, some >> have netbooks with only small (but fast!) solid state disks. >> Now why again should they install gigs of headers and >> debugging-symbols when they just need the libs and apps to run jack >> and assorted? >> >> Arnold >> > > Arnold, I don't have much money. 1. A hard disk isn't expensive. 2. > For e.g. 64 Studio 3.0-beta3 amd64 libjack0.100.0-dev does need 61.4 > kb and not gigs. I'm just talking about JACK. 3. Who does use Linux > audio and doesn't need libjack-dev? 4. Who does produce music on a > 20GB hard disk? C'mon ;)! > > IMHO it would be good once and for all to clear all issues because of > packages for JACK and IMHO the best way seems to be to have everything > that is JACK in one package. > > :) > Ralf
Pardon, maybe the package is 61.4 kb and maybe the extracted files do need a little bit more, lets say 1 MB ;), if so, use another wallpaper to save this 1 MB ;). _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev