Am Freitag, den 16.04.2010, 19:38 +0200 schrieb Arnold Krille: > On Friday 16 April 2010 19:23:33 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > hermann wrote: > > > I hope, when debian switch to jack2, they will make it in one packet > > > (maximal a second for the dev files), that's what could make it easer to > > > switch the version for people how like to switch. > > Full ACK, OTOH let's put our hands on our hearts ... Who is using Linux > > audio and doesn't compile one or two things depending to JACK ;)? I vote > > for one package for all! > > Hopefully they will think again before following this. > > Why should all users get the files on their disks that are needed only for > debugging and developing? > Disk-space might not be an issue with your state-of-the-art-all-inclusive > machine, but not everyone has such a thing. Some have older machines still > running with <20GB disk, some have netbooks with only small (but fast!) solid > state disks. > Now why again should they install gigs of headers and debugging-symbols when > they just need the libs and apps to run jack and assorted? > > Arnold
Then we have 2 packages for each (jackd, jackd-dev), that's fine, but why the hell we need a separate package for jackd and libjack ? I never hear about a use-case of jackd without libjack or opposite ? hermann _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev