Am Samstag, 19. Januar 2019 22:26 CET, Len Ovens <l...@ovenwerks.net> schrieb: > In my experience as a musician, I meet a lot of > piano players for whom the difference bewteen MIDI 1 and MIDI 2 is just a > number (like 192k ADC) and would not affect their performance. However, I > have > not met very many keyboard artists aside from those who work from their > bedroom > and who's music I only hear on youtube, soundcloud, etc. I do not know how > much > difference MIDI 2 would make for most of these people either. Epecially > concidering how many of them use either their qwerty kb to enter notes or a > one > or two octave unit without even velocity... > > In fact MIDI 2 seems to be a thing mostly for non-kb instruments or computer > generated material (most of which is probably using CV instead of MIDI > anyway). >
Well, it all depends :-) I my world there's a group of users for whose field standard MIDI just does'nt work: teaching and researching professional piano playing. The main obstacle is (the missing) velocity/volume/attack speed resolution. So our teachers and researchers need to use the partly-proprietary Yamaha Disklavier. So,for them, a modern MIDI 2 is appreciated. Cheers, RalfD _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
