On Sun, 20 Jan 2019, Ralf Mattes wrote:

In terms of velocity vs. amplitude I would guess that 127 levels at 1db
per level covers more than most ADC's would show. At .5db per level the
range is still probably wider than the dynamic range available in a nice
quiet studio/sound stage... so I would hope that the range of timbre
differences makes a wider range of velocities worth while. I would like to
see a blind AB test where the same performance is rendered by the same
synth in both MIDI 1 and MIDI 2.

Not what our piano teachers say ;-)

I believe you... That is hardly blind AB testing though. Mr. young tells us that remastering to 24bits/192k will bring out things in his earlier recordings originally recorded on tape too.

What I find interesting (funny) is that the one thing in MIDI 2 that would make the least difference to someone's performance is the one thing people want. The good things about MIDI2 in my mind are things like being able to have an untempered or variable scale. Being able to pitch change each note separately. Having many more CCs. Just to name a few. Guitar to MIDI can make good use of it. Some of the new stick like controllers might do well too. But keyboards? subtle at best I think.

--
Len Ovens
www.ovenwerks.net
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Reply via email to