Hello Quo,
thanks for your reply.
>> But then:
root@homeserver:/mnt/__Complete_Disk# btrfs fi df /mnt/__Complete_Disk/
Data, RAID5: total=3.83TiB, used=3.78TiB
System, RAID5: total=32.00MiB, used=576.00KiB
Metadata, RAID5: total=6.46GiB, used=4.84GiB
GlobalReserve, single: total=512.00MiB, used=0.00B
GlobalReserve is not a chunk type, it just means a range of metadata
reserved for overcommiting.
And it's always single.
Personally, I don't think it should be output in "fi df" command, as
it's in a higher level than chunk.
At least for your case, nothing is needed to worry about.
But this seems to be a RAID5 now, right?
Well, that's what I want, but the command was:
btrfs balance start -dprofiles=single -mprofiles=raid1
/mnt/__Complete_Disk/
So, we would expect raid1 here, no?
Greetings,
Hendrik
On 01.08.2015 22:44, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Hugo Mills <h...@carfax.org.uk> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 10:09:35PM +0200, Hendrik Friedel wrote:
Hello,
I converted an array to raid5 by
btrfs device add /dev/sdd /mnt/new_storage
btrfs device add /dev/sdc /mnt/new_storage
btrfs balance start -dconvert=raid5 -mconvert=raid5 /mnt/new_storage/
The Balance went through. But now:
Label: none uuid: a8af3832-48c7-4568-861f-e80380dd7e0b
Total devices 3 FS bytes used 5.28TiB
devid 1 size 2.73TiB used 2.57TiB path /dev/sde
devid 2 size 2.73TiB used 2.73TiB path /dev/sdc
devid 3 size 2.73TiB used 2.73TiB path /dev/sdd
btrfs-progs v4.1.1
Already the 2.57TiB is a bit surprising:
root@homeserver:/mnt# btrfs fi df /mnt/new_storage/
Data, single: total=2.55TiB, used=2.55TiB
Data, RAID5: total=2.73TiB, used=2.72TiB
System, RAID5: total=32.00MiB, used=736.00KiB
Metadata, RAID1: total=6.00GiB, used=5.33GiB
Metadata, RAID5: total=3.00GiB, used=2.99GiB
Looking at the btrfs fi show output, you've probably run out of
space during the conversion, probably due to an uneven distribution of
the original "single" chunks.
I think I would suggest balancing the single chunks, and trying the
conversion (of the unconverted parts) again:
# btrfs balance start -dprofiles=single -mprofile=raid1
/mnt/new_storage/
# btrfs balance start -dconvert=raid5,soft -mconvert=raid5,soft
/mnt/new_storage/
Yep I bet that's it also. btrfs fi usage might be better at exposing
this case.
--
Hendrik Friedel
Auf dem Brink 12
28844 Weyhe
Tel. 04203 8394854
Mobil 0178 1874363
---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
