Martin <rc6encryp...@gmail.com> writes: > The smallest disk of the 122 is 500GB. Is it possible to have btrfs > see each disk as only e.g. 10GB? That way I can corrupt and resilver > more disks over a month.
Well, at least you can easily partition the devices for that to happen. However, I would also suggest that would it be more useful use of the resource to run many arrays in parallel? Ie. one 6-device raid6, one 20-device raid6, and then perhaps use the rest of the devices for a very large btrfs filesystem? Or if you have been using partitioning the large btrfs volume can also be composed of all the 122 devices; in fact you could even run multiple 122-device raid6s and use different kind of testing on each. For performance testing you might only excert one of the file systems at a time, though. -- _____________________________________________________________________ / __// /__ ____ __ http://www.modeemi.fi/~flux/\ \ / /_ / // // /\ \/ / \ / /_/ /_/ \___/ /_/\_\@modeemi.fi \/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html