...
> > > >>
> > > >>>> For exemple
> > > >>>> <rsc_location id="drbd1_loc_nodeA" rsc="drbd1">
> > > >>>> <rule id="pref_drbd1_loc_nodeA" score="600">
> > > >>>> <expression attribute="#uname" operation="eq" value="nodeA"
> > > >>>> id="pref_drbd1_loc_nodeA_attr"/>
> > > >>>> </rule>
> > > >>>> <rule id="pref_drbd1_loc_nodeB" score="800">
> > > >>>> <expression attribute="#uname" operation="eq" value="nodeB"
> > > >>>> id="pref_drbd1_loc_nodeB_attr"/>
> > > >>>> </rule>
> > > >>>> </rsc_location>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> In this case, nodeB will be primary for resource drbd1. Is that what
> > > >>>>
> > > >> you
> > > >>
> > > >>>> were looking for ?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>> Not like this, not when using the drbd OCF Resource Agent as a
> > > >>> master-slave one. In that case, you need to bind the rsc_location to
> > > >>>
> > > >> the
> > > >>
> > > >>> role=Master as well.
> > > >>>
> > > >> I was missing this in the CIB idioms page. I just added it.
> > > >>
> > > >> http://linux-ha.org/CIB/Idioms
I tried setting up colocation constraints similar to those shown in the
example referenced in the URL above, and it complained about the
identical ids:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] xml]# more rule_fs_on_drbd_slave.xml
<rsc_colocation id="fs_on_drbd" to="rsc_drbd_7788" to_role="slave"
from="fs_mirror" score="-infinity"/>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] xml]# more rule_fs_on_drbd_stopped.xml
<rsc_colocation id="fs_on_drbd" to="rsc_drbd_7788" to_role="stopped"
from="fs_mirror" score="-infinity"/>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] xml]# cibadmin -o constraints -C -x
rule_fs_on_drbd_stopped.xml
[EMAIL PROTECTED] xml]# cibadmin -o constraints -C -x
rule_fs_on_drbd_slave.xml
Call cib_create failed (-21): The object already exists
<failed>
<failed_update id="fs_on_drbd" object_type="rsc_colocation"
operation="add" reason="The object already exists">
<rsc_colocation id="fs_on_drbd" to="rsc_drbd_7788" to_role="slave"
from="fs_mirror" score="-infinity"/>
</failed_update>
</failed>
I'm going to change the ids to be unique and try again, but wanted to
point this out since it is very similar to the example on the web page.
Doug
> > > >> http://linux-ha.org/CIB/Idioms/MasterConstraints
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Linux-HA mailing list
> > > > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
> > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> > > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Linux-HA mailing list
> > > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
> > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-HA mailing list
> > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
