Hi & Thanks I don't think the 1000 or 5000 value makes any difference, so the rsc_options could make it work ? But do you have also the order with a clone ? Because on other of my configurations, I have also property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \ default-resource-stickiness="5000" and the resource does not failback automatically ... so ... Could somebody explain ? Thanks Alain
De : Dan Frincu <df.clus...@gmail.com> A : General Linux-HA mailing list <linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org> Date : 03/08/2011 13:00 Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] location and orders : Question about a behavior ... Envoyé par : linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org Hi, On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:06 PM, <alain.mou...@bull.net> wrote: > Hi > > I have this simple configuration of locations and orders between resources > group-1 , group-2 and clone-1 > (on a two nodes ha cluster with Pacemaker-1.1.2-7 /corosync-1.2.3-21) : > > location loc1-group-1 group-1 +100: node2 > location loc1-group-2 group-2 +100: node3 > > order order-group-1 inf: group-1 clone-1 > order order-group-2 inf: group-2 clone-1 > > property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \ > dc-version="1.1.2-f059ec7ced7a86f18e5490b67ebf4a0b963bccfe" \ > cluster-infrastructure="openais" \ > expected-quorum-votes="2" \ > stonith-enabled="true" \ > no-quorum-policy="ignore" \ > default-resource-stickiness="5000" \ I use it as: rsc_defaults $id="rsc-options" \ resource-stickiness="1000" Instead of: property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \ default-resource-stickiness="5000" And the behavior is the expected one, no failback. HTH, Dan > > (and no current cli- preferences) > > When I stop the node2, the group-1 is well migrated on node3 > But when node2 is up again, and that I start Pacemaker again on node2, > the group-1 automatically comes back on node2 , and I wonder why ? > > I have other similar configuration with same location constraints and same > default-resource-stickiness value, but without order with a clone > resource, > and the group does not come back automatically. But I don't understand why > this order constraint would change this behavior ... > > Thanks for your help > Alain Moullé > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > -- Dan Frincu CCNA, RHCE _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems