On 29 Feb 2012, at 21:03, Florian Haas wrote:

> And you're sure you've got a healthy Corosync membership?
> "corosync-cfgtool -s" shows all rings healthy? "corosync-objctl | grep
> member" shows 2 members?

I'm not sure what the output is supposed to look like, but it certainly gives 
the impression of being healthy:

On www4:
Printing ring status.
Local node ID 192961885
RING ID 0
        id      = 192.168.0.11
        status  = ring 0 active with no faults

On www5:
Printing ring status.
Local node ID 343956829
RING ID 0
        id      = 192.168.0.148
        status  = ring 0 active with no faults

Are they each meant to show both nodes here?

On both nodes:
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.343956829.ip=r(0) ip(192.168.0.148) 
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.343956829.join_count=1
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.343956829.status=joined
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.192961885.ip=r(0) ip(192.168.0.11) 
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.192961885.join_count=1
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.192961885.status=joined

But crm status gives this on www4 (this is still running my manually launched 
cib/attrd):

============
Last updated: Wed Feb 29 20:14:08 2012
Last change: Wed Feb 29 17:34:55 2012
Current DC: NONE
0 Nodes configured, unknown expected votes
0 Resources configured.
============

and this on www5

============
Last updated: Wed Feb 29 20:14:01 2012
Last change: Wed Feb 29 17:29:20 2012 via crmd on www5
Stack: openais
Current DC: www5 - partition with quorum
Version: 1.1.6-9971ebba4494012a93c03b40a2c58ec0eb60f50c
2 Nodes configured, 2 expected votes
0 Resources configured.
============

Node www4: pending
Online: [ www5 ]

Any the wiser?

Marcus
-- 
Marcus Bointon
Synchromedia Limited: Creators of http://www.smartmessages.net/
UK info@hand CRM solutions
mar...@synchromedia.co.uk | http://www.synchromedia.co.uk/



_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to