On 2013-03-13T20:13:30, "GGS (linux ha)" <support-linu...@ggsys.net> wrote:
> Their configuration, resources, etc. are
> not intermingled, so we prefer not to
> configure them in a single setup. For
> simplicity we are using the R1 built
> into heartbeat and not CRM.
What you want to do is very simple to do with a pacemaker based cluster
and very difficult to get right with multiple instances of heartbeat
(among other things: fencing, getting multiple instances to run in the
first place, etc).
> I don't mind the administrative overhead of
> putting a whole ha tree an compile a copy
> for each of my stacks. If that's what it
> takes that's what I'll do.
So, to achieve simplicity, you're willing to pay a significant overhead
on complexity. That makes sense.
You see to want to shoot yourself in the foot. Why?
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
