On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 17:55 +0100, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > Yeah, I'd agree that today there are scenarios where "a cloud" makes > more sense then a traditional HA environment. OpenStack et al still have > to up their HA game a bit, though.
You are being way too kind, a lot of improvement is needed. > > > > And the concept of HA clusters predates "the cloud" slightly. > > Relevant if you're looking at maintenance/upgrade on an existing > > cluster. Patching heartbeat to manage 200 services independently sounds > > like a new project. > > Right. Thankfully, we already have that, it's called pacemaker ;-) And that's where I'm looking next, I hope it is "easy". > > Regards, > Lars Alberto _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
