On 2013-11-28 01:55, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 28 Nov 2013, at 11:29 am, Jefferson Ogata <linux...@antibozo.net> wrote:
On 2013-11-28 00:12, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
Just so you know:
RedHat's (centos, actually) latest build of resource-agents sets $HA_BIN
to /usr/libexec/heartbeat. The daemon in heartbeat-3.0.4 RPM is
/usr/lib64/heartbeat/heartbeat so $HA_BIN/heartbeat binary does not exist.
(And please hold the "upgrade to pacemaker" comments: I'm hoping if I
wait just a little bit longer I can upgrade to ceph and openstack -- or
retire, whichever comes first ;)
Hey, "upgrading" to pacemaker wouldn't necessarily help. Red Hat broke that last month by
dropping most of the resource agents they'd initially shipped. (Don't you love "Technology
Previews"?)
Thats the whole point behind the "tech preview" label... it means the software
is not yet in a form that Red Hat will support and is subject to changes _exactly_ like
the one made to resource-agents.
Um, yes, i know. That's why i mentioned it.
It's nicer, however, when Red Hat takes a conservative position with the
Tech Preview. They could have shipped a minimal set of resource agents
in the first place, so people would have a better idea what they had to
provide on their own end, instead of pulling the rug out with nary a
mention of what they were doing.
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
