On Thu, Nov 28, 2013, at 10:26 AM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > On 2013-11-27 20:15, Jefferson Ogata wrote: > > > It's nicer, however, when Red Hat takes a conservative position with the > > Tech Preview. They could have shipped a minimal set of resource agents > > in the first place, so people would have a better idea what they had to > > provide on their own end, instead of pulling the rug out with nary a > > mention of what they were doing. > > The other issue is epel packaging: unsupported obsolete heartbeat-3.0.4 > should arguably not depend on bleeding edge tech preview packages in the > first place. If anything, it should conflict with pacemaker & co.
Technically pacemaker can still be built to support heartbeat, so making it a conflict is not strictly correct. The complications came from the combination of some of EPELs policies, build ordering/dependancies and heartbeat being overly monolithic to begin with. > However, if epel maintainer has no time to make 30-second edit to > /etc/init.d script I don't expect him to repackage the whole thing right > in my lifetime. > > Dima > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
