On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 03:38:41PM +1000, Craig Small wrote: > I would like to propose a project to create a converse daemon that is > licensed under the GPL. I have seen recent work on patching one or more Aside from tradition, what's wrong with just using IRC over packet? (OK, maybe that's a dumb question but I don't mean it to be, I was seriously considering trying that...) -- _______ Shawn T. Rutledge / KB7PWD [EMAIL PROTECTED] (_ | |_) http://www.bigfoot.com/~ecloud [EMAIL PROTECTED] __) | | \________________________________________________________________ Get money for spare CPU cycles at http://www.ProcessTree.com/?sponsor=5903
- Call to create conversd that is GPLed Craig Small
- Re: Call to create conversd that is GPLed Shawn T. Rutledge
- Re: Call to create conversd that is GPLed Robin Gilks
- Re: Call to create conversd that is GPLed Heikki Hannikainen
- Re: Call to create conversd that is GP... Robert Schelander
- Re: Call to create conversd that is GPLed Heikki Hannikainen
- Re: Call to create conversd that is GPLed Joerg Reuter
- Re: Call to create conversd that is GPLed Shawn T. Rutledge
- Re: Call to create conversd that is GPLed Heikki Hannikainen
- Re: Call to create conversd that is GPLed Heikki Hannikainen
- Re: Call to create conversd that is GPLed Craig Small
- Re: Call to create conversd that is GPLed Joop Stakenborg