Linux-Hardware Digest #267, Volume #9 Mon, 25 Jan 99 15:13:57 EST
Contents:
Re: Where to spend more money to speed up file server? (Matt Steinhoff)
Stealth64 8-bit Color (Brad Freeman)
Does m/b cache size make *that* much difference? (Chris Menzel)
Newbie Question (tami)
Re: linux & aha1522A & Yamaha 4416 (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9=20Ure=F1a?=)
RealPlayer problems ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Problem with Jaton67P and X-window ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Vibra16X and linux (Jean-Serge Gagnon)
Re: any sucess on pci modem (Mircea)
Re: aha1542 Timeout Problem (Mircea)
Re: AMD K6-2 Processors and Linux (Frank Lohr)
Re: LT Win Modem (Mircea)
Re: partitioning woes (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9=20Ure=F1a?=)
3c509 - device or resource busy - register value 6d00 (Andy)
RedHat 5.1 and SCSI (Len Cuff)
Re: aha1542cf not detected (Mircea)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Matt Steinhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.dcom.servers
Subject: Re: Where to spend more money to speed up file server?
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 11:45:58 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
What sort of data are you serving? How many users do you
have hitting the server at a time?
Since RAID support is experimental in the 2.0 kernels, I'd
suggest that you either wait for 2.2 or, better yet, get a
hardware RAID controller. (SMP is experimental as well.)
I don't think you'll be short on CPU power though you
should make sure your bus is 100mHz and not 66mHz. A few NICs
is probably uncessary; two should be more than enough to
saturate your system.
Matt
John Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking to set up a linux file server, primarily running samba
> 2.0, using s/w disk mirroring. My basic server would look like this:
>
> * 2x Pentium II 350 MHz
> * 256 MB 100 MHz ECC SDRAM
> * 8 x 9 GB IBM Ultrastar 9ES disk drives, mirrored, on 4 ultrawide
> scsi channels or 2 ultrawide + 1 ultra2.
> * A few 100 BaseT ethernet cards.
>
> Possible upgrades (# means UK pounds, about US$1.6 FWIW):
>
> +#200 400MHz Pentiums
> +#400 450MHz Pentiums
> +#300 (?) extra 256 MB RAM, 512 MB in total
>
> Disk drive RPM Seek Transfer rate
> +#0 Ultrastar 9ES 7200 7.5ms 108.6-171.1
> +#520 Ultrastar 9LP 7200 6.5ms 92.2-179.2
> +#800 Ultrastar 9LZX 10020 5.6ms 187.2-243.7
>
> So, where, if anywhere, is it worth spending more money? I guess what
> I'm asking is, in a linux server running samba and s/w disk mirroring
> on multiple ethernet cards, is the limit in the disks, the CPU,
> memory, memory bandwidth, or something more nebulous? And is there any
> part of the above which is noticably weaker than the rest?
------------------------------
From: Brad Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Stealth64 8-bit Color
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 11:11:01 -0500
I'm a Linux newbie and have spent the past three days trying to get my
XFree86 server to display 8-bit, 256-color at 1024x768 res using my
Diamond Stealth64 adapter. I get 8-bit color at 800x600, but not at
1024x768. It works OK in Windows 98.
Here are the specifics:
Diamond Stealth64 Video 2001 Series v1.06
S3 Trio64V + PCI (86C765) Rev E
1 MB DRAM
Caldera OpenLinux 1.3
XF86_S3 and XF86_SVGA (tried both)
Thanks in advance to anyone out there who can help me with this.
Brad Freeman
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Menzel)
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc
Subject: Does m/b cache size make *that* much difference?
Date: 25 Jan 1999 16:15:34 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have been running some small perl scripts on two K6-2/300 Linux
machines that differ only in the motherboard cache size -- one has 1MB,
the other 512k. The scripts involve very little disk I/O (just loading
the perl executable and the 5-15k scripts; no disk I/O initiated in the
scripts themselves). The machine with the 1MB cache consistently runs
the scripts about 50% faster. Can the cache size make *that* much
difference? I've had a couple people suggest that it can, but have
heard no real definitive answer. Anybody got one?
Much obliged.
==================================================================
Christopher Menzel | web: philebus.tamu.edu/~cmenzel
Philosophy, Texas A&M University | net: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
College Station, TX 77843-4237 | vox: (409) 845-8764
==================================================================
------------------------------
From: tami <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Newbie Question
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 12:40:40 -0500
Hello, i'm new to PC hardware and i'm looking for some documentation on
the standard features of pc's (esp. 486's). A few questions that the
document(s) should answer are:
1- What features are standard on most 486's? (isa slots?, bus speeds?,
number and type of processor registers?)
2- Who made those standards and who is currently setting standards for
current pc architecture? Is it one group?, or maybe a combination of
groups? Perhaps a standards organization like ISO or ANSI?
3- An explanation of the Master,Slave,Cable Select, DS, options when
connecting drives to a 486? I'd like to know who designed this and the
motivation for providing these options. Also what is the correct way to
set up a system using these options.
You see, i've set up linux successfully but it was a largely methodical
process when it came to configuring the hardware correctly. I knew that
there were only a finite number of ways to configure the system hardware
so i proceeded through each configuration until i arrived at the first
working configuration. Needless to say this process was very
frustrating and i'd prefer to know exactly what it is that i'm doing and
why. Thanks in advance for any help/suggestions.
-tami
------------------------------
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9=20Ure=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Re: linux & aha1522A & Yamaha 4416
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 12:01:20 -0500
==============69EE37F76701507646D079D9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Did you compiled SCSI cdrom support into the kernel?
My yamaha works fine with my initio 9100u
also remember that the first scsi cd is at /dev/scd0
/dev/cdrom will not always work unless
you remove the /dev/cdrom link and make a new one
cd /dev
rm cdrom
ln -s /dev/scd0 cdrom
if you already have an IDE cdrom
then just make a cdrw
ln -s /dev/scd0 cdrw
"Andrew S. Prior" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just purchased an Adaptec 1522A SCSI controller and a Yamaha 4416CDR.
> Despite all my efforts to make these work with linux, I can't. The controller
> is recognized at bootup, but the CD isn't. I've tried various settings on
> the card with no luck. I figured it was a cabling/termination problem until
> W95 saw the drive right away (I never told it about the CD but it accessed
> it right away) and could read from it with no problems. To me this
> suggests that the hardware is working fine. I've read through the linux
> Hardware-Howto, the old SCSI-Howto, poked through drivers/scsi/aha152x.c,
> Adaptec's web site, and even tried deja-news to find information on this
> problem and have come up empty.
>
> The one idea I *do* have, that I'm not sure of, is upgrading the BIOS in the
> SCSI card. On bootup it says it's BIOS revision 1.2L and adaptec's web site
> has revision 1.4. I'm not sure I want to try that. The BIOS message that
> the card displays shows no information about attached devices, even though
> I have the jumper settings for displaying "SCSI device information".
>
> If somebody could give me some help here figuring out what's wrong, I would
> VERY much appreciate it. I've not used SCSI much, and don't know what else
> to try. You should find all the useful information (that I can find) that
> the system provides below. I specifically don't know how to interpret the
> information in "/proc/scsi/aha152x/0" (listed below) to see if it provides
> a hint.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Andrew Prior
>
> ----------
> --> boot messages:
>
> aha152x: processing commandline: ok
> aha152x: BIOS test: passed, detected 1 controller(s)
> aha152x0: vital data: PORTBASE=0x140, IRQ=11, SCSI ID=7, reconnect=enabled,
>parity=enabled, synchronous=disabled, delay=100, extended translation=disabled
> aha152x: trying software interrupt, ok.
> scsi0 : Adaptec 152x SCSI driver; $Revision: 1.7 $
> scsi : 1 host.
> scsi : detected total.
>
> -----------
> --> from /proc/scsi/scsi
>
> Attached devices: none
> -----------
> --> from /proc/scsi/aha152x/0
>
> Adaptec 152x SCSI driver; $Revision: 1.7 $
> ioports 0x0140 to 0x015f
> interrupt 0x0b
> disconnection/reconnection enabled
> parity checking enabled
> synchronous transfers disabled
> 0 commands currently queued
> enabled debugging options: (abort) (reset)
>
> queue status:
> no not yet issued commands
> no current command
> no disconnected commands
>
> waiting: SCSISEQ (); SCSISIG (DATA OUT); INTSTAT (lo); SSTAT (SELINGO BUSFREE );
>SSTAT (); SXFRCTL0 (CH1 ); SIGNAL (); SELID (84), SSTAT2 (SEMPTY ); SFCNT (0);
>SCSICNT (0), OFFCNT(0), SSTAT4 (); DMACNTRL0 (16BIT PIO READ INTEN ); DMASTAT
>(DFIFOEMP )
>
> enabled interrupts ()
==============69EE37F76701507646D079D9
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Did you compiled SCSI cdrom support into the kernel?
<p>My yamaha works fine with my initio 9100u
<p>also remember that the first scsi cd is at /dev/scd0
<br>/dev/cdrom will not always work unless
<br>you remove the /dev/cdrom link and make a new one
<p>cd /dev
<br>rm cdrom
<br>ln -s /dev/scd0 cdrom
<p>if you already have an IDE cdrom
<br>then just make a cdrw
<p>ln -s /dev/scd0 cdrw
<p>"Andrew S. Prior" wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE> Hi,
<p> I just purchased an Adaptec 1522A SCSI controller and a Yamaha
4416CDR.
<br>Despite all my efforts to make these work with linux, I can't.
The controller
<br>is recognized at bootup, but the CD isn't. I've tried various
settings on
<br>the card with no luck. I figured it was a cabling/termination
problem until
<br>W95 saw the drive right away (I never told it about the CD but it accessed
<br>it right away) and could read from it with no problems. To me
this
<br>suggests that the hardware is working fine. I've read through
the linux
<br>Hardware-Howto, the old SCSI-Howto, poked through drivers/scsi/aha152x.c,
<br>Adaptec's web site, and even tried deja-news to find information on
this
<br>problem and have come up empty.
<p> The one idea I *do* have, that I'm not sure of, is upgrading
the BIOS in the
<br>SCSI card. On bootup it says it's BIOS revision 1.2L and adaptec's
web site
<br>has revision 1.4. I'm not sure I want to try that. The
BIOS message that
<br>the card displays shows no information about attached devices, even
though
<br>I have the jumper settings for displaying "SCSI device information".
<p> If somebody could give me some help here figuring out what's
wrong, I would
<br>VERY much appreciate it. I've not used SCSI much, and don't know
what else
<br>to try. You should find all the useful information (that I can
find) that
<br>the system provides below. I specifically don't know how to interpret
the
<br>information in "/proc/scsi/aha152x/0" (listed below) to see if it provides
<br>a hint.
<p> Thanks!
<p>
Andrew Prior
<p>----------
<br> --> boot messages:
<p>aha152x: processing commandline: ok
<br>aha152x: BIOS test: passed, detected 1 controller(s)
<br>aha152x0: vital data: PORTBASE=0x140, IRQ=11, SCSI ID=7, reconnect=enabled,
parity=enabled, synchronous=disabled, delay=100, extended translation=disabled
<br>aha152x: trying software interrupt, ok.
<br>scsi0 : Adaptec 152x SCSI driver; $Revision: 1.7 $
<br>scsi : 1 host.
<br>scsi : detected total.
<p>-----------
<br> --> from /proc/scsi/scsi
<p>Attached devices: none
<br>-----------
<br> --> from /proc/scsi/aha152x/0
<p>Adaptec 152x SCSI driver; $Revision: 1.7 $
<br>ioports 0x0140 to 0x015f
<br>interrupt 0x0b
<br>disconnection/reconnection enabled
<br>parity checking enabled
<br>synchronous transfers disabled
<br>0 commands currently queued
<br>enabled debugging options: (abort) (reset)
<p>queue status:
<br>no not yet issued commands
<br>no current command
<br>no disconnected commands
<p>waiting: SCSISEQ (); SCSISIG (DATA OUT); INTSTAT (lo); SSTAT (SELINGO
BUSFREE ); SSTAT (); SXFRCTL0 (CH1 ); SIGNAL (); SELID (84), SSTAT2 (SEMPTY
); SFCNT (0); SCSICNT (0), OFFCNT(0), SSTAT4 (); DMACNTRL0 (16BIT PIO READ
INTEN ); DMASTAT (DFIFOEMP )
<p>enabled interrupts ()</blockquote>
</html>
==============69EE37F76701507646D079D9==
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RealPlayer problems
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:08:32 GMT
Hi everybody!
I am running Linux 2.2-pre6 in hte S.u.S.E. environment. My soundcard appears
to work fine (it is a S3 Sonicvibes compatible TurtleBeach). I downloaded
RealPlayer v5.0 and when I am trying to launch it it gives me Error #1
(described on the RealAudio's help WWW page as a "General Error") and on the
command line prints "audio: write error". I checked permissions on
/dev/audio,- they are rw-rw-rw-... I am perplexed.
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Boris.
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject: Problem with Jaton67P and X-window
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:33:27 GMT
I'm having problem installing X.
I have a Jaton Video 67P and and 15" AT&T screen.
I'm running slacware 3.5
does anyone have this Videocard or can somone give me some advice.
------------------------------
From: Jean-Serge Gagnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Vibra16X and linux
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 14:20:56 -0500
Does this card work under linux?
I've got isapnp and it finds it, but when I try to load the sound
blaster module to control it, I get:
sb: Interrupt test on IRQ9 failed - device disabled
even though my /proc/interrupts is:
0: 303931 timer
1: 10579 keyboard
2: 0 cascade
3: 37614 + serial
5: 831 NE2000
8: 1 + rtc
11: 562981 + fdomain
12: 6666 eth0
13: 1 math error
14: 128 + ide0
any ideas?
------------------------------
From: Mircea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: any sucess on pci modem
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 12:15:33 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah..I'm still waiting for someone to post a success story before
rushing in..
MST
David Fox wrote:
>
> Multitech makes a PCI modem that should work under linux, model
> number MT5634ZPX-PCI.
> --
> David Fox http://hci.ucsd.edu/dsf xoF divaD
> UCSD HCI Lab baL ICH DSCU
------------------------------
From: Mircea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: aha1542 Timeout Problem
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 12:17:42 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMHO, it's a termination problem. Check comp.sys.scsi for similar posts.
My aha1542 works just fine under linux 2.2.0-pre9.
MST
Carsten Michel wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I managed to compile the Kernel for my aha1542 and during startup, the
> adapter is
> found. But then, when he tries to find the devices, he gets lots of
> timeouts!
> And he retries it continuosly. So I'm not able to boot or to provide any
>
> boot.msg messages.
> Anyone an Idee??
> Carsten
------------------------------
From: Frank Lohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: AMD K6-2 Processors and Linux
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 20:16:40 +0100
"Tim Gajewski, KU4IY" wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> I am looking at upgrading soon and was probably going to get an AMD K6-2
> 400 MHz. Does Linux have any problems with this chip or should I go with
> the PII 400 MHz?
>
> Thanks, Tim
K6-2 is a great CPU. Buy it. I 'm glad that only Windoze 95 has it's problems
with that fast processor :))
Frank
------------------------------
From: Mircea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: LT Win Modem
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 12:18:34 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, you need another modem.
MST
Jay wrote:
>
> I was wondering...I have a Lucent Winmodem and know that it won't work in
> DOS. Will it work in Linux? If not is there any way I can get special
> drivers so that it will?
> Thanks,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9=20Ure=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: partitioning woes
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 12:22:47 -0500
==============B0DBF1E0CBAABB35DCEE7E96
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I am not aware of the fat32 backup table being placed at the end of the disk
where can I read about that?
but I am aware that symantec programs do create a backup of the boot and fat table
and guess where they put the backup?
Do you have any symantec utility programs in your computer? or did you ever?
the symantec image program, which is part of most symantec software packages,
creates a backup image of important harddisk data at the end of the disk.
Delete the files and they will be recreated next time that you run any of the
symantec utilities
also, when defragging the disk, do not use a DOS utility for any fat32 drive unless
it knows
what a fat32 is.
Aaron Birkland wrote:
> I am sorry to post what is probably a very basic question on this
> newsgroup, but I am soon going to attempt to install Linux (of the Debian
> persuasion) on its own partition on my hard drive, which right now is one
> large 6.4 GB FAT32 partition. I would have loved to defragment the drive so
> that I have a continuous block of free space which I could split with FIPS, and
> then format and play with as I like. There is one caveat, however. As it
> turns out, Win98 has been putting something on the last cylinder of the drive
> that it does not want moved. I have no idea exactly what it is or why it is
> there, but I sure don't like it there. So far, I haven't been able to find an
> answer, although I stumbled across one theory that if you get rid of the hidden
> and system file attributes, Defrag will move the data off the last cylinder. I
> haven't actually done that yet, but am working on a batch file that would take
> away the attributes, and another one to restore them once the deed is done.
>
> If changing the attributes doesn't work (and many people have said that
> it wouldn't), I will probably be faced with the task of wiping out everything
> and starting from scratch (I don't want to shell out for something like
> partition Magic). Has anybody out there dealt with a similar situation? and
> if so, is there a way to create the partition nondestructively?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Aaron Birkland
==============B0DBF1E0CBAABB35DCEE7E96
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
I am not aware of the fat32 backup table being placed at the end of the
disk
<br>where can I read about that?
<p>but I am aware that symantec programs do create a backup of the boot
and fat table
<br>and guess where they put the backup?
<p>Do you have any symantec utility programs in your computer? or did you
ever?
<p>the symantec image program, which is part of most symantec software
packages,
<br>creates a backup image of important harddisk data at the end of the
disk.
<p>Delete the files and they will be recreated next time that you run any
of the symantec utilities
<p>also, when defragging the disk, do not use a DOS utility for any fat32
drive unless it knows
<br>what a fat32 is.
<p>Aaron Birkland wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>I am sorry to post what is probably a very basic
question on this
<br>newsgroup, but I am soon going to attempt to install Linux (of the
Debian
<br>persuasion) on its own partition on my hard drive, which right now
is one
<br>large 6.4 GB FAT32 partition. I would have loved to defragment
the drive so
<br>that I have a continuous block of free space which I could split with
FIPS, and
<br>then format and play with as I like. There is one caveat, however.
As it
<br>turns out, Win98 has been putting something on the last cylinder of
the drive
<br>that it does not want moved. I have no idea exactly what it is
or why it is
<br>there, but I sure don't like it there. So far, I haven't been
able to find an
<br>answer, although I stumbled across one theory that if you get rid of
the hidden
<br>and system file attributes, Defrag will move the data off the last
cylinder. I
<br>haven't actually done that yet, but am working on a batch file that
would take
<br>away the attributes, and another one to restore them once the deed
is done.
<p> If changing the attributes
doesn't work (and many people have said that
<br>it wouldn't), I will probably be faced with the task of wiping out
everything
<br>and starting from scratch (I don't want to shell out for something
like
<br>partition Magic). Has anybody out there dealt with a similar
situation? and
<br>if so, is there a way to create the partition nondestructively?
<p> Thanks,
<p> Aaron Birkland</blockquote>
</html>
==============B0DBF1E0CBAABB35DCEE7E96==
------------------------------
From: Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: 3c509 - device or resource busy - register value 6d00
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:17:06 +0000
I have a 3com 509 (ISA) network card under redhat 5.2
The module fails to load with device or resource busy.
I have disabled plug'n'play.
It does not seem to be a problem with IRQ's.
The error appears to be at in el3_probe within 3c509.c:
EL3WINDOW(0);
if ( inw(ioaddr) != 0x6d50)
{
return -ENODEV;
}
The call to inw(ioadd) returns 0x6d00 _not_ 0x6d50 !!
This is confirmed by running the el3_diag program which returns
Generating the activation sequence on port 0x100 for card 1.
Activating the card at I/O address 300.
EEPROM contents:
0060 8c95 dbe9 9050 bb51 0041 4157 6d50 0010 af00 0060 8c95 dbe9 3f20
0000 40a0
An ISA EtherLink III board was activated at I/O 0x300, IRQ 10.
The board was activated at 0x300, but does not appear in I/O space!
ID register at 0x300 is 0x6d00, status register at 0x30e is 00.
<------6d00 !!!! --------
Window 0: 6d00 9000 2f00 0000 af00 0100 ff00 0000.
Window 1: ff00 ff00 0000 0000 8000 0000 0700 2000.
Window 2: ff00 ff00 ff00 0000 af00 0100 ff00 4000.
Window 3: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0700 0700 6000.
Window 4: 2300 0100 2000 0000 0000 a800 0100 8000.
Window 5: 0700 0700 0000 0700 ff40 0000 0000 a000.
Window 6: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 c000.
Window 7: 0100 0100 0100 0100 0100 0100 0100 e000.
Done card 1.
Looking for card 2.
Generating the activation sequence on port 0x100 for card 2.
Activating the card at I/O address 3f0.
No ISA EtherLink III boards appear to be at index 2.
Whats wrong??
Andy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Len Cuff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RedHat 5.1 and SCSI
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 19:27:57 +0000
Reply-To: Len Cuff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I've just tried to install RedHat 5.1 Linux but have hit a major
problem.
I have an Adaptec 1515 SCSI card fitted which is fine under DOS
and WIN95 but Redhat refuses to recognise it. I tried almost all options
given but still no joy. Is there any way that I can get it to find it ?
It's a bit of a showstopper as I have a 4G drive and a tape drive
connected to it !
WIN95 sees it as an ADAPTEC AHA-152X/AIC6X60 plus a few others.
Maybe there is a driver out there somewhere ?? Tried the RedHat site but
no joy.
The card is sat at default settings I/O 340 and IRQ 11
Cheers,
Len
------------------------------
From: Mircea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: aha1542cf not detected
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 12:24:47 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh yeah..I wish you get your mailbox clogged by 359 messages/day, see
how it feels. They're after us, I tell you...
MST
Christoph Lorenz wrote:
>
> Mircea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Lamer :-(
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.hardware) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************
