On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Ira Abramov wrote: > Quoting Shoshannah Forbes, from the post of Wed, 22 Jan: > > >I'm adore lynx. Am I fit into standards? > > > > If the site is built well, it should degrade gracefully. Lynx is not > > 100% standard compliant, but standard sites work better with it then > > non- standard ones. > > I'm not sure how much better links is over lynks, but w3m excells over > the two in tables, frames and doublebyte chars (I'm not into chinese, > but I believe it should handle UTF-8 Hebrew, haven't tried)
Try viewing a Hebrew UTF-8 page from a ISO-8859-8 terminal (and tell lynx that the terminal is indeed such!). Hebrew chars should show up just fine. Try viewing a page with accented latin charaters on a Hebrew terminal, and you'll get the original letters, without the accesnts (latin1->ascii "conversion"). Lynx certainly has pretty good multi-lingual support. -- Tzafrir Cohen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
