On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 02:36:46PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > Last - a correction for Muli. While the main distro site was not broken > into, the "security" and "non-us" sites were. Apparently, non of the > packages were tampered with, but the actual servers holding the packages > were, in fact, broken into.
I said: "The debian advisory was very explicit that the archive was never compromised." The advisory says: "The archive is not affected by this compromise!" "archive" in the sense of "the packages", not in the sense of the archive machines. Cheers, Muli -- Muli Ben-Yehuda http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/ "the nucleus of linux oscillates my world" - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
