Hi,

FYI:  

1) Don't use irmanager!

2) I have no problem using -test11-pre6. This mail was sent using IrLAN in that
kernel ;-)

Try again without irmanager! Run irattach directly!

-- Dag

On Fri, 17 Nov 2000 21:22:07 +0400 (GMT-4), you wrote:
> Ok, so i've got a bit further with pre5 and pre6 of 2.4.0-test-11,
> but it appears that irmanager and irattach won't start because
> it looks like the latest irda patches take out the /proc device
> registration of the irda module from the kernel
> 
> linux/net/irda/irmod.c
> ....snip...
> -       irda.dev.fops = &irda_fops;
> -
> -       misc_register(&irda.dev);
> -
> -       irda.in_use = FALSE;
> -
> ....snip...
> 
> so now irmanager.c does this twice in main()
> 
>         minor = lookup_dev("irda");
>         if (minor < 0 ) {
>                 load_module("irda");
>                 minor = lookup_dev("irda");
>         }
> 
> and then carries on with a bogus minor (-19 as the error return code)
> and totally fails. Dag this need to be fixed - i.e. checking the return
> codes.
> 
> So it appears pre5/6 of the latest kernel patch doesn't work if you don't
> have a FIR mode device. My laptop doesn't have a recoginised FIR device
> so  i  need to use SIR. As a result if i start irattach manually on
> my serial port, since irmanager is not running i an easily get the  kernel
> to panic quite easily as it the irda module needs support from the
> userland deamon which obviously won't start.
> 
> Was it intentional to take our SIR mode support ?
> 
> thanx
> Mitch
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-IrDA mailing list  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.pasta.cs.UiT.No/mailman/listinfo/linux-irda
> 
> 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Linux-IrDA mailing list  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pasta.cs.UiT.No/mailman/listinfo/linux-irda

Reply via email to