On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 02:33:48PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > If you have a better idea for memory management, I'd > like to hear it ;) You know 2.4.0-test1-ac22-class++ beaten 2.4.0-test1-ac22-riel++ under low memory scenario, right? The only thing it can be a problem for an alternate VM if there would be user<->kernel API differences realted to the very internal of the memory management so if possible I'd like if that could be avoided. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Very aggressive swapping after 2 hours rest Trever Adams
- Re: Very aggressive swapping after 2 hours rest Byron Stanoszek
- Re: Very aggressive swapping after 2 hours rest Byron Stanoszek
- Re: Very aggressive swapping after 2 hours rest Rik van Riel
- Re: Very aggressive swapping after 2 hours ... Byron Stanoszek
- Re: Very aggressive swapping after 2 ho... Rik van Riel
- Re: Very aggressive swapping after... Byron Stanoszek
- Re: Very aggressive swapping after... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: Very aggressive swapping after... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Very aggressive swapping after... Rik van Riel
- Re: Very aggressive swapping after... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Very aggressive swapping after... Rik van Riel
- Re: Very aggressive swapping after... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Very aggressive swapping after... Rik van Riel
- Re: Very aggressive swapping after... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Very aggressive swapping after... Rik van Riel
- Re: Very aggressive swapping after... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Very aggressive swapping after... Byron Stanoszek
- Re: Very aggressive swapping after... Helge Hafting
- Re: Very aggressive swapping after... Rik van Riel
- Re: Very aggressive swapping after... Rik van Riel