In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> safemode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [mega snip] See http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html for all of the good reasons why the vger lists behave just the way they should. -- Henrik Storner | "Crackers thrive on code secrecy. Cockcroaches breed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | in the dark. It's time to let the sunlight in." | | Eric S. Raymond, re. the Frontpage backdoor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-te... Christoph Rohland
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-te... David Ford
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-te... Christoph Rohland
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-... Christoph Rohland
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM safemode
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM safemode
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM safemode
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be ... Mohammad A. Haque
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be ... David Ford
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to... safemode
- [OT] lkml reply-to header (was: Re: pr... Henrik Størner
- [OT] lkml reply-to header (was: Re: pr... David Ford
- RE [OT] Reply to headder.. Gerhard Mack
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seem... Matthew Kirkwood
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be ... Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM safemode
- Re: Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM safemode
- Re: Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM safemode