Hi David, David Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think it's time to get Christoph on the line and see what he has > to say. The 4096 number is a limit to the system, you can have a > max of 4096 shared memory segments systemwide. Do you know offhand > which programs are using(abusing) shm? Here I am on the line again. But fortunately you found out yourself that it's not the kernel to blame... Greetings Christoph - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM David Ford
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be S... safemode
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to ... David Ford
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems... David Ford
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 ... safemode
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-p... David Ford
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-p... safemode
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-p... David Ford
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-p... safemode
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems... David Ford
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems... Christoph Rohland
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 ... David Ford
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-p... Christoph Rohland
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to ... Christoph Rohland
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM safemode
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM safemode
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM safemode
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM Mohammad A. Haque
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM David Ford
- Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be S... safemode
- Munging reply-to headers etc. (was: Re: pro... Henrik Størner