On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 06:15:44AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > You can completely ignore this question. I saw Martins reply with a fix for > "tpm_tis: Use devm_ioremap_resource" that you should squash into that > change.
It isn't quite the right fix - but I've added something that should be OK now that Martin has debugged it. > So it's proved that TPM ACPI device objects do not always have a > memory resource. Good. Hopefully.. It is so confusing because tpm_tis had that wrong fallback, and tpm_crb incorrectly doesn't use the resource structure. So we've never actually had anything that requires the resource struct for 2.0 until now. > resubmit a new revision of the series to the mailing list so that it can > be peer-reviewed once again. If Martin is happy I will send them to the list, the latest patches are on my github: https://github.com/jgunthorpe/linux/commits/for-jarkko Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/