> > I'm a bit confused about the discussion because Martin replied that > > tpm_tis used to get the address range before applying this series. > > > > And pnp_driver in the backend for TPM 1.x devices grabs the address > > range from DSDT. > > You can completely ignore this question. I saw Martins reply with a fix for > "tpm_tis: Use devm_ioremap_resource" that you should squash into that > change. So it's proved that TPM ACPI device objects do not always have a > memory resource. Good.
Repeat, the memory resource DOES exist on my system. Not sure what proof you saw there. Martin