On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 09:06:50AM +0100, Wilck, Martin wrote: > > > I'm a bit confused about the discussion because Martin replied that > > > tpm_tis used to get the address range before applying this series. > > > > > > And pnp_driver in the backend for TPM 1.x devices grabs the address > > > range from DSDT. > > > > You can completely ignore this question. I saw Martins reply with a fix for > > "tpm_tis: Use devm_ioremap_resource" that you should squash into that > > change. So it's proved that TPM ACPI device objects do not always have a > > memory resource. Good. > > Repeat, the memory resource DOES exist on my system. Not sure what proof > you saw there.
Ok, lets go this through. I deduced this from two facts: * It used to have memory resource as conditional and as a fallback use fixed value. * Your workaround reverted the situation to this. Did I understand something incorrectly? /Jarkko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
