On Sat, 10 Sep 2016, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote: > > > On Thu, 8 Sep 2016, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > * Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com> wrote: > > > > static unsigned long set_apic_id(unsigned int id) > > > > { > > > > - unsigned long x; > > > > - > > > > /* maskout x2apic_extra_bits ? */ > > > > - x = id; > > > > - return x; > > > > + return id; > > > > } > > > > > > This was clearly left there to document a quirk and as a placeholder for > > > future > > > changes. > > > > Keeping the comment and rewording it to: > > > > /* CHECKME: Do we need to mask out the xapic extra bits */ > > > > should be good enough. The variable dance is not really giving any value. > > Yeah, sure - my point was that the mindless removal is wrong.
He kept the comment. The rewording is a bonus.