* Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2016, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 8 Sep 2016, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > * Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com> wrote:
> > > > > static unsigned long set_apic_id(unsigned int id)
> > > > > {
> > > > > - unsigned long x;
> > > > > -
> > > > > /* maskout x2apic_extra_bits ? */
> > > > > - x = id;
> > > > > - return x;
> > > > > + return id;
> > > > > }
> > > >
> > > > This was clearly left there to document a quirk and as a placeholder
> > > > for future
> > > > changes.
> > >
> > > Keeping the comment and rewording it to:
> > >
> > > /* CHECKME: Do we need to mask out the xapic extra bits */
> > >
> > > should be good enough. The variable dance is not really giving any value.
> >
> > Yeah, sure - my point was that the mindless removal is wrong.
>
> He kept the comment. The rewording is a bonus.
Ok, fair enough.
Thanks,
Ingo
