On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Frank Rowand <frowand.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 10/27/16 05:47, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:58 PM, <frowand.l...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> From: Frank Rowand <frank.row...@am.sony.com> >> >> I prefer to leave the prefixes and this is getting into pointless churn. >> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.row...@am.sony.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/of/resolver.c | 10 +++++----- >>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> > > If I was just submitting this as a single patch, I would agree. > > But since I am making so many other changes, I think it makes > sense to do this as part of this series. It is broken apart > as a separate patch to be easy to review and not pollute any > of the other patches in the series. > > The prefixes add no value for a local function, but they do > add noise when reading code.
The value is when reading the calling function, you know the function is a DT related function. You don't know it's a static function without looking up the function name. That said, I wouldn't object to code originally written either way, I just don't see the value in changing it. Rob
