Hi, Tony and Fabio,
Could you please upload your kernel binary to somewhere for me? I don't
understand why some ARM boards is OK while others are broken.
Huacai
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Andrew Morton"<a...@linux-foundation.org>;
Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2018 03:15 AM
To: "Fabio Estevam"<feste...@gmail.com>;
Cc: "Tony Lindgren"<t...@atomide.com>; "Huacai Chen"<che...@lemote.com>;
"Stephen Rothwell"<s...@canb.auug.org.au>; "Rich Felker"<dal...@libc.org>;
"Russell King"<li...@arm.linux.org.uk>; "Yoshinori
Sato"<ys...@users.sourceforge.jp>;
"linux-kernel"<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; "Ralf
Baechle"<r...@linux-mips.org>; "linux-omap"<linux-o...@vger.kernel.org>; "James
Hogan"<james.ho...@mips.com>; "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM
ARCHITECTURE"<linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org>;
Subject: Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector
On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 15:45:27 -0300 Fabio Estevam <feste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Looks like commit 5638790dadae ("zboot: fix stack protector in
> > compressed boot phase") breaks booting on arm.
>
> Yes, almost all imx are broken in linux-next due to this commit:
> https://kernelci.org/soc/imx/job/next/kernel/next-20180323/
Thanks, I dropped it and I expect Stephen will also do that.
