Allwinner devices are OK, Exynos devices (except 4210) are OK. ------------------ Original ------------------ From: "Tony Lindgren"<[email protected]>; Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2018 11:37 PM To: "陈华才"<[email protected]>; Cc: "Andrew Morton"<[email protected]>; "Fabio Estevam"<[email protected]>; "Stephen Rothwell"<[email protected]>; "Rich Felker"<[email protected]>; "Russell King"<[email protected]>; "Yoshinori Sato"<[email protected]>; "linux-kernel"<[email protected]>; "Ralf Baechle"<[email protected]>; "linux-omap"<[email protected]>; "James Hogan"<[email protected]>; "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"<[email protected]>; Subject: Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector * 陈华才 <[email protected]> [180326 06:59]: > Hi, Tony and Fabio, > > Could you please upload your kernel binary to somewhere for me? I don't > understand why some ARM boards is OK while others are broken.
Well the kernel I'm testing is just current Linux next cross compiled omap2plus_defconfig kernel. I do have few more config options enabled like LOCKDEP and DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP, but I doubt they matter here :) Then I'm using gcc-7.3.0 and binutils-2.30 built with the buildall.git scripts: git://git.infradead.org/users/segher/buildall.git If you still need binaries, let me know. Do you know which arm devices are working with your patch? Regards, Tony
