On 09/03/21 12:23, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The timer along with GPIO API are NULL-aware, there is no need to test
> against existing GPIO echo line.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pps/clients/pps-gpio.c | 8 +++-----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pps/clients/pps-gpio.c b/drivers/pps/clients/pps-gpio.c
> index 78c9680e8063..dc9ed6fc3dae 100644
> --- a/drivers/pps/clients/pps-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/pps/clients/pps-gpio.c
> @@ -240,11 +240,9 @@ static int pps_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>       struct pps_gpio_device_data *data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  
>       pps_unregister_source(data->pps);
> -     if (data->echo_pin) {
> -             del_timer_sync(&data->echo_timer);
> -             /* reset echo pin in any case */
> -             gpiod_set_value(data->echo_pin, 0);
> -     }
> +     del_timer_sync(&data->echo_timer);
> +     /* reset echo pin in any case */
> +     gpiod_set_value(data->echo_pin, 0);
>       dev_info(&pdev->dev, "removed IRQ %d as PPS source\n", data->irq);
>       return 0;
>  }
> 

Acked-by: Rodolfo Giometti <giome...@enneenne.com>

-- 
GNU/Linux Solutions                  e-mail: giome...@enneenne.com
Linux Device Driver                          giome...@linux.it
Embedded Systems                     phone:  +39 349 2432127
UNIX programming                     skype:  rodolfo.giometti

Reply via email to