On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 08:18:41PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I've yet to see a user who wants WC. Lets face it, WC *sucks*. This > > > is why > > > > Interesting. > > does this refresh your memory: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/10/99
I'm still far from convinced it covers all cases (see also Roland's example) Arjan might be right for some modern graphics hardware, but there is a lot more hardware out there than only this, old and new and non graphics and graphics that Arjan didn't cover. If Arjan was 100% right then PAT would not be needed at all. I wonder why Venki/Suresh went through all the pain of resurrecting the old PAT patchkit then!? Surely there is more about this. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/