* Mandeep Singh Baines <m...@chromium.org> wrote:
> We shouldn't try_to_freeze if locks are held. Verified that
> I get no lockdep warnings after applying this patch and
> "vfork: don't freezer_count() for in-kernel users of CLONE_VFORK".
>
> Changes since v1:
> * LKML: <20130215111635.ga26...@gmail.com> Ingo Molnar
> * Added a msg string that gets passed in.
> * LKML: <20130215154449.gd30...@redhat.com> Oleg Nesterov
> * Check PF_NOFREEZE in try_to_freeze().
> Changes since v2:
> * LKML: <20130216170605.gc4...@redhat.com> Oleg Nesterov
> * Avoid unnecessary PF_NOFREEZE check when !CONFIG_LOCKDEP.
> * Mandeep Singh Baines
> * Generalize an exit specific printk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <m...@chromium.org>
> CC: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
> CC: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
> CC: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
> CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@sisk.pl>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <mi...@redhat.com>
Looks good to me now.
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Which tree should this go through?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
