* Mandeep Singh Baines <[email protected]> wrote: > We shouldn't try_to_freeze if locks are held. Verified that > I get no lockdep warnings after applying this patch and > "vfork: don't freezer_count() for in-kernel users of CLONE_VFORK". > > Changes since v1: > * LKML: <[email protected]> Ingo Molnar > * Added a msg string that gets passed in. > * LKML: <[email protected]> Oleg Nesterov > * Check PF_NOFREEZE in try_to_freeze(). > Changes since v2: > * LKML: <[email protected]> Oleg Nesterov > * Avoid unnecessary PF_NOFREEZE check when !CONFIG_LOCKDEP. > * Mandeep Singh Baines > * Generalize an exit specific printk. > > Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <[email protected]> > CC: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> > CC: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> > CC: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> > CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> > CC: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Looks good to me now. Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Which tree should this go through? Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
