On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:37:19 AM Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Mandeep Singh Baines <[email protected]> wrote: > > > We shouldn't try_to_freeze if locks are held. Verified that > > I get no lockdep warnings after applying this patch and > > "vfork: don't freezer_count() for in-kernel users of CLONE_VFORK". > > > > Changes since v1: > > * LKML: <[email protected]> Ingo Molnar > > * Added a msg string that gets passed in. > > * LKML: <[email protected]> Oleg Nesterov > > * Check PF_NOFREEZE in try_to_freeze(). > > Changes since v2: > > * LKML: <[email protected]> Oleg Nesterov > > * Avoid unnecessary PF_NOFREEZE check when !CONFIG_LOCKDEP. > > * Mandeep Singh Baines > > * Generalize an exit specific printk. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <[email protected]> > > CC: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> > > CC: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> > > CC: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> > > CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> > > CC: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> > > Looks good to me now. > > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> > > Which tree should this go through?
Well, I can take it if that's OK. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
