* Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:37:19 AM Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Mandeep Singh Baines <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > We shouldn't try_to_freeze if locks are held. Verified that
> > > I get no lockdep warnings after applying this patch and
> > > "vfork: don't freezer_count() for in-kernel users of CLONE_VFORK".
> > >
> > > Changes since v1:
> > > * LKML: <[email protected]> Ingo Molnar
> > > * Added a msg string that gets passed in.
> > > * LKML: <[email protected]> Oleg Nesterov
> > > * Check PF_NOFREEZE in try_to_freeze().
> > > Changes since v2:
> > > * LKML: <[email protected]> Oleg Nesterov
> > > * Avoid unnecessary PF_NOFREEZE check when !CONFIG_LOCKDEP.
> > > * Mandeep Singh Baines
> > > * Generalize an exit specific printk.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <[email protected]>
> > > CC: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
> > > CC: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
> > > CC: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> > > CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
> > > CC: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> >
> > Looks good to me now.
> >
> > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> >
> > Which tree should this go through?
>
> Well, I can take it if that's OK.
Sure, that's fine with me - this is mainly a freezer feature
after all.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
