* Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:37:19 AM Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Mandeep Singh Baines <m...@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > > We shouldn't try_to_freeze if locks are held. Verified that
> > > I get no lockdep warnings after applying this patch and
> > > "vfork: don't freezer_count() for in-kernel users of CLONE_VFORK".
> > >
> > > Changes since v1:
> > > * LKML: <20130215111635.ga26...@gmail.com> Ingo Molnar
> > > * Added a msg string that gets passed in.
> > > * LKML: <20130215154449.gd30...@redhat.com> Oleg Nesterov
> > > * Check PF_NOFREEZE in try_to_freeze().
> > > Changes since v2:
> > > * LKML: <20130216170605.gc4...@redhat.com> Oleg Nesterov
> > > * Avoid unnecessary PF_NOFREEZE check when !CONFIG_LOCKDEP.
> > > * Mandeep Singh Baines
> > > * Generalize an exit specific printk.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <m...@chromium.org>
> > > CC: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
> > > CC: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
> > > CC: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
> > > CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@sisk.pl>
> > > CC: Ingo Molnar <mi...@redhat.com>
> >
> > Looks good to me now.
> >
> > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
> >
> > Which tree should this go through?
>
> Well, I can take it if that's OK.
Sure, that's fine with me - this is mainly a freezer feature
after all.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
