Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
>> index 79e0448..84d5f2d 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
>> @@ -769,6 +769,33 @@ static int hpp__entry_baseline(struct hist_entry *he, 
>> char *buf, size_t size)
>>       return ret;
>>  }
>>
>> +static int hpp__color_delta(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt,
>> +                     struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he)
>> +{
>> +     struct diff_hpp_fmt *dfmt =
>> +             container_of(fmt, struct diff_hpp_fmt, fmt);
>> +     struct hist_entry *pair = get_pair_fmt(he, dfmt);
>> +     double percent;
>> +     char pfmt[20] = " ";
>> +
>> +     if (!pair)
>> +             goto dummy_print;
>
> same comment here ^^^ as for previous patch

Hm? The comment on the previous patch pertained to printing the delta
if he->dummy was set (ie. if `he' doesn't have any pairs). This
statement is analogous to the logic in __hpp__entry_global(): if
(!pair), then the next line checking pair->diff.computed will segfault
without this check.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to