Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org> writes: > Hey, Jeff. > > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 04:27:10PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: >> >> Remove @gfp_mask from cfq_find_alloc_queue() and propagate the changes >> >> to its callers. This simplifies the function quite a bit and will >> >> help making async queues per-cfq_group. >> > >> > Sorry, I disagree with this patch. You've changed it so that all cfqq >> > allocations are GFP_ATOMIC, and most, if not all of them simply don't >> > need to be. >> >> It occurs to me that replacing GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_NOWAIT in your patch >> would address my concerns, and patches 6-8 would apply almost as-is. >> What do you think about that? > > Oh yeah, it's okay to fail these allocations under memory pressure. > GFP_NOWAIT is the better pick here. It's GFP_ATOMIC mostly due to > historic copy&paste anyway. I'll change them to GFP_NOWAIT.
OK. Assuming that's the only change, you can go ahead and add my Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmo...@redhat.com> to the next iteration. Thanks! Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
