Linux-Misc Digest #617, Volume #25               Wed, 30 Aug 00 01:13:03 EDT

Contents:
  Re: Netscape Sucks, I need another option. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: NPR report mentioning Linux and OpenBSD (Scott Packard)
  Re: Netscape Sucks, I need another option. (Cristian)
  Re: Netscape Sucks, I need another option. (David M. Cook)
  Re: Start a process on second CPU? (Jean-David Beyer-valinux)
  Need some icons. ("Yura")
  Re: X-Window must die! What's alternative? (Grant Edwards)
  Re: Netscape Sucks, I need another option. (Richard Steiner)
  Re: Abit BH6 RH6.2 2.2.16 CPU Temp Monitor (Prasanth A. Kumar)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Netscape Sucks, I need another option.
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 02:52:53 GMT

In article <8ohd1r$3qa$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  "Gabe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm a new Linux user. The best thing about Windows is Internet
Explorer,
> because frankly, Netscape sucks. It's slow, buggy, and doesn't display
pages
> correctly.

Well, I don't find it *that* bad, but I am growing less satisfied with
Netscape with every release.

>
> I need another option besides Lynx. Is there another browser I can use
in X
> that comes highly recommended?

None that I know of, Lynx and Netscape are the only two I've been happy
with under Linux.

When I'm at my primary machine, I can always fire up vmware and run IE
under it, it works quite well. Oddly, W98 under vmware is more stable
for me than it ever has been running firectly on the hardware. I do this
mostly to make sure that Windows users can view my web pages.

If you go this route, I suggest a processer in the 400MHz plus range,
the faster the better, and at least 128M of RAM. I'm much happier with
256M.

--
Jim Buchanan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

Crossposted-To: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd
Subject: Re: NPR report mentioning Linux and OpenBSD
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Packard)
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 03:20:34 GMT

I shouted out in the car "OpenBSD's not Linux!" when I heard
that on NPR.

Regards, Scott

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
says...
>
>I got a big laugh out of last night's National People's Radio report
>on the big Linux meeting.  They played an example meant to give the
>flavor of Linux-geek-speak with all the usual technobabble.
>
>The funny part was that said he was working on getting something
>working on OpenBSD and never mentioned Linux.  It apparently went
>right over the news editor's head.  The report was all about
>Linux with this exception, of course.


------------------------------

From: Cristian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Netscape Sucks, I need another option.
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 03:21:29 GMT

Gabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need another option besides Lynx. Is there another browser I can use in X
> that comes highly recommended?

I wonder why no one has mentioned _konqueror_? (I know, you would need at
least to install Qt and kde libraries, and it is more than a browser). I
currently use netscape (fastest so far in rendering), but will change to
konqueror as soon as the stable version is released and gets *stable*
(which should happen in about two weeks?).
Take a look at www.konqueror.org .
C.


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David M. Cook)
Subject: Re: Netscape Sucks, I need another option.
Date: 30 Aug 2000 03:39:40 GMT

On Tue, 29 Aug 2000 15:16:19 -0700, Gabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>I need another option besides Lynx. Is there another browser I can use in X
>that comes highly recommended?

Have you tried one of the nightly mozilla builds?  

http://mozilla.org

Dave Cook

------------------------------

From: Jean-David Beyer-valinux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Start a process on second CPU?
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 00:02:22 -0400

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Does anybody know how to specify which CPU to start a process on?
> Maybe a tool that does it?
>
> I know that the latest kernels distribute processes evenly over multiple
> CPU's, but i really, REALLY want to start a specific process on a specific
> cpu.
>
> And, is there anyway to find out wich processes are running on which CPU?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.

Since linux-smp is a Symmetric Multiprocessing System, why would you need to
know on which CPU a process starts on, or what CPU it is running on? The
instant after it starts, it could be switched to another CPU anyway, so where
it starts is not really very important, IMAO.

I frequently run two CPU-intensive processes; setiathome, that runs at nice
+19 (i.e, with minimum likelihood of runnnig), and the other a suite of
programs doing a populate of a database, at nice 0 (i.e., with normal
priority).
If you run xosview, it will show you what each CPU is doing. User mode
programs are displayed in green, Nice programs are displayed in yellow,
system is displayed in orange, and idle is displayed in sort-of cyan.

So in my case, the yellow cpu is the one running the setiathome process and
the green cpu is running the database process. If you examine the output of
this xosview program, you will see which cpu runs each program, provided you
are running only those two programs. Since all the daemons, etc., are also
running, this will not be exact, but illisutrate pretty well why it does not
matter on which cpu a process starts.

--
 .~.   Jean-David Beyer           Registered Linux User 85642.
 /V\                              Registered Machine    73926.
/( )\  Shrewsbury, New Jersey
^^-^^  9:58pm up 21 days, 5:27, 0 users, load average: 0.99, 0.97, 0.91




------------------------------

From: "Yura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Need some icons.
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 04:12:38 GMT

 Hi!
If anybody has some good icon packs, please email me.
I'll appreciate it a lot.
Just don't offer me the ones from Gnome/KDE :))

Thanks in advance!


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Grant Edwards)
Subject: Re: X-Window must die! What's alternative?
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 04:14:15 GMT

In article <mb_q5.545913$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Christopher Browne wrote:

>>    >> Is there X-Window alternative?
>>
>>    http://www.berlin-consortium.org/
>
>"Berlin" isn't going to be an "alternative" to X until:
>a) There is a web browser that can speak SSL that runs on it;
>b) There is a port of Emacs to run on it;
>c) There is a capable mail reader to run on it.

Lynx, Emacs, and mutt will run on it as soon as it has a decent terminal
emulator.

90% of what I use X for is to run a half-dozen text-mode programs at the
same time anyway.  I still need the other 10% though...

-- 
Grant Edwards                   grante             Yow!  YOW!!! I am having
                                  at               fun!!!
                               visi.com            

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Steiner)
Subject: Re: Netscape Sucks, I need another option.
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 23:12:49 -0500

Here in comp.os.linux.misc, "Gabe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
spake unto us, saying:

>I need another option besides Lynx. Is there another browser I can use
>in X that comes highly recommended?

The KDE desktop's default file manager (kfm) is also a web browser (it
uses the konqueror browsing engine).

I generally use links (another text-based browser for Linux, OS/2, and
BeOS which displays frames and tables properly):

  http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mikulas/links/

-- 
   -Rich Steiner  >>>--->  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  >>>--->  Bloomington, MN
      OS/2 + BeOS + Linux + Solaris + Win95 + WinNT4 + FreeBSD + DOS
       + VMWare + Fusion + vMac + Executor = PC Hobbyist Heaven! :-)
         If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done?  :-(

------------------------------

Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.redhat
Subject: Re: Abit BH6 RH6.2 2.2.16 CPU Temp Monitor
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Prasanth A. Kumar)
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 04:20:41 GMT

Nathan Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I've got a Celeron 300a (running at 450) on an Abit BH6 motherboard, and
> I was wondering if there is a way to monitor the CPU temp in Linux (I
> use WindowMaker, Afterstep, and / or Enlightenment, or the cli).  I use
> MotherBoard Monitor for my Windoze boxes, but I haven't been able to
> find anything that will run under *nix.  If anyone knows of a utility or
> kernel patch that will let me do this, please e-mail me at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> thanks in advance,
> 
> nathan j. underwood

You need something like lm_sensors for the kernel drivers and
optionally a gui program lime gnomesensors or wmsensors for a pretty
looking interface. I happen to have a Abit BH6 motherboard also and
know that the above worked on it although I haven't really used those
programs for a while now.

-- 
Prasanth Kumar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************

Reply via email to