On Mon, 24 Apr 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Look at your sample in code, it is invalid. It cannot be generated by > some real TCP stack. I see. Yes, the remote TCP stack is probably broken. Very well, I will keep it as a local patch available to those who want it. You may remove the code, as it is not required by standards-conformant TCP stacks. Taral - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- tcp_input.c change Taral
- Re: tcp_input.c change David S. Miller
- Re: tcp_input.c change kuznet
- Re: tcp_input.c change Taral
- Re: tcp_input.c change Taral
- Re: tcp_input.c change kuznet
- Re: tcp_input.c change Taral
- Re: tcp_input.c change kuznet
- Re: tcp_input.c change Kev
- Re: tcp_input.c change kuznet
- Re: tcp_input.c change Taral
- Re: tcp_input.c change Stephen Satchell
- Re: tcp_input.c change Taral
- Re: tcp_input.c change kuznet
- Re: tcp_input.c change Taral
- Re: tcp_input.c change kuznet
- Re: tcp_input.c change Taral
- Re: tcp_input.c change kuznet
- Re: tcp_input.c change Taral
