On Mon, 24 Apr 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > OK, if you cannot regenerate the sequence of events (I know, it is not > so easy), I still can assume that you did a misprint there. Edit that > sample, at least. No. The third packet in the sequence does NOT reach host2 before the fourth packet is transmitted by host2. I don't see how that's invalid TCP behavior. Taral - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: tcp_input.c change kuznet
- Re: tcp_input.c change Taral
- Re: tcp_input.c change Taral
- Re: tcp_input.c change kuznet
- Re: tcp_input.c change Taral
- Re: tcp_input.c change kuznet
- Re: tcp_input.c change Kev
- Re: tcp_input.c change kuznet
- Re: tcp_input.c change Taral
- Re: tcp_input.c change Stephen Satchell
- Re: tcp_input.c change Taral
- Re: tcp_input.c change kuznet
- Re: tcp_input.c change Taral
- Re: tcp_input.c change kuznet
- Re: tcp_input.c change Taral
- Re: tcp_input.c change kuznet
- Re: tcp_input.c change Taral
