On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Richard Adams wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, you wrote:
>
> > You are wrong.
> > 2.4.* is quite stable on many boxes.
>
> Huum, ok, i am certainly not going to argue, however "development kernels" are
> NOT disscussed here.
>
2.4.* are not development kernels.
2.4.*-pre* are development kernels.
> > FYI - 2.4 is stable branch.
> > I want to be up-to-date with stable branch.
>
> That is up to you, its your choise, AFAIK it does not concern this list.
>
Indeed.
--
Mike Ricketts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Phone: +44 7968 381810
Nothing is faster than the speed of light ...
To prove this to yourself, try opening the refrigerator door before the
light comes on.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
