On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> Michael B. Trausch enscribed thusly:
> > On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, David Krings wrote:
> > > So why do you say that it has to be 198.162.x.x ? What is wrong with
> > > 198.0.x.x ?
>
> > 198.162.x.x is the established standard. If you choose to deviate, good
> > luck.
>
> No... Actually 192.168.x.x is the standard. 198.162.x.x are
> allocated address blocks (lots of them). 198.0.x.x is not currenly
> allocated (at least I get a "no match" back from ARIN) but may be in
> the future.
>
Sorry.. I make a typo :) Time for me to stop using that damn numeric
keypad. :)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael B. Trausch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lunix... because I'm better than you.
