> -----Original Message----- > From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:h...@dev.mellanox.co.il] > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 3:52 PM > > On 6/10/2015 1:04 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote: > >> Not in the patches themselves but in the general issue when a PR changes. > >> > >> Do you think this needs addressing or are things fine as they are now ? > > > > IMO, I think it needs addressing in terms of "can the proposed netlink > > architecture and design accommodate this sort of request in the future?" > We shouldn't design in a limitation up front. I don't see anything in the > current approach that would cause an issue. There would likely be a need for > new messages and attributes. > > Can user space say it can't > service a request ? Yes. It can NACK a request.
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
