> Not directly. IPoIB treats it that way. I guess to "be safe". > > Officially one should register for UnPath/RePath traps. But no one has > ever implemented that. > > To be clear I am agreeing with Hal that having some sort of "update > signal" would be nice. But I don't think that must be done before this > series goes in. > > I think a PR "update signal" should be an extension to this interface.
I agree. I just wanted to make sure that there wasn't some feature regarding PRs, such as unpath, that a kernel client would lose (i.e. it is currently implemented) by changing how the PRs are retrieved. Basically nothing breaks with this change. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
