> Not in the patches themselves but in the general issue when a PR changes. > > Do you think this needs addressing or are things fine as they are now ?
IMO, I think it needs addressing in terms of "can the proposed netlink architecture and design accommodate this sort of request in the future?" We shouldn't design in a limitation up front. I don't see anything in the current approach that would cause an issue. There would likely be a need for new messages and attributes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
