On 6/10/2015 11:21 AM, Hefty, Sean wrote: >> While this appears to address the current upstream use model for ACM >> with it's multicast overlay backend where PRs are static, it does not >> appear to address PR changes. > > Although this ties into ibacm, from the viewpoint of the kernel, there's no > requirement on the user space implementation.
True. This is not how it works in the kernel today. It is meant as future thinking/exploring. >> Should aging/revalidation of PRs be supported ? If so, would this make >> PRs similar at "high" level to IP neighbor cache in kernel ? > > This is requesting a new feature not supported by anything in the kernel > today, and would seem to fall well > outside the scope of the suggested changes. Outside scope of suggested changes but where does the kernel need to head in the longer term ? > Is there a specific issue in the patches that you are seeing related to this? Not in the patches themselves but in the general issue when a PR changes. Do you think this needs addressing or are things fine as they are now ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
