Re: 2.0.36 anyone?

[Dale E. Martin]

Andy Poling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Believe it or not, there are a few (ahem) folks running SMP systems in
> production, and the 2.0 kernels may not be the cat's meow, but they
> certainly are the tool for the job if you want/need stability above all else.

I (and others) have found the late 2.1.x (for me > 2.1.104) to be way more
stable than any 2.0.3x kernel.  You might want to give one a try - better
performance, too.  As usual, YMMV.

Later,
        Dale
-- 
+--------------------  finger for pgp public key  ---------------------+
| Dale E. Martin |  Clifton Labs, Inc.  |  Senior Computer Engineer    |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]    |    http://www.clifton-labs.com         |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+