On Wed, 4 Nov 1998, Mark Hahn wrote: > any 2.0 SMP box that is not strictly cpu-bound is basically crippled. Stupid question: if a machine is not CPU bound, what is the purpose of adding CPUs?
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Mark Hahn
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Andy Poling
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Mark Hahn
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Alan Cox
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Robert M. Hyatt
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Alan Cox
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Robert G. Brown
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Robert M. Hyatt
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Richard L. England, Jr.
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Alan Cox
- <TID> Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Douglas Ridgway
- <TID> Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Marc E. Christensen
- Re: <TID> Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Mark Heath
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Dale E. Martin
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? System Administrator
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Alan Cox
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Mark Hahn
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Daniel Veillard
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Dave J. Andruczyk
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Chris Weyl
