> In my, non expert, opinion factors of 2.5 and 3.7 are not easily > justified by the "simple" fact they used a non tweaked stock kernel > and some poorly configured samba server (BTW I haven't seen any > justification for the Apache results). They took a known performance interaction with NT/95 problem kernel and seemingly intentionally combined it with a known non SMP friendly scsi driver, then they deconfigured the software and made a maximal attempt to avoid getting technical help. If that doesn't smell fishy to you, I've got this bridge for sale - Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/mentre/smp-faq/ To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Fwd: FW: NT vs Linux info (fwd) Anatolii Belomestnov
- Re: Fwd: FW: NT vs Linux info (fwd) Alan Cox
- Re: NT vs Linux info Rui Sousa
- Re: NT vs Linux info jakob
- Re: NT vs Linux info Dick Balaska
- Re: NT vs Linux info Matthew Hixson
- Re: NT vs Linux info Alan Cox
- Re: NT vs Linux info Robert G. Brown
- Re: NT vs Linux info Douglas W. St.Clair
- Re: NT vs Linux info Andy Poling
- Re: FW: NT vs Linux info (fwd) Alan Cox
- Re: FW: NT vs Linux info (fwd) Anatolii Belomestnov
- Re: FW: NT vs Linux info (fwd) Alan Cox
- Re: FW: NT vs Linux info (fwd) Mark Hull-Richter
- Re: FW: NT vs Linux info (fwd) - a new angle Peter L. Phillips
- Re: FW: NT vs Linux info (fwd) - a new a... bcurnow
- Re: FW: NT vs Linux info (fwd) - a n... Peter L. Phillips
- Re: FW: NT vs Linux info (fwd) - a new a... Douglas W. St.Clair
- Re: FW: NT vs Linux info (fwd) - a n... Peter L. Phillips
- Re: FW: NT vs Linux info (fwd) - a new a... Frank de Lange
